Tuesday, October 4, 2016

A Learner is Like a Box of Chocolates...

A learner is like a box of chocolates...you never know what you're gonna get! I hope you recognize my shameless Forrest Gump plug. Hey, a classic is a classic! And in this case, this analogy couldn't be more perfect for describing learners today. In my previous posts, I've mentioned how the classroom is changing, and fast.  I've talked about how gone are the days where students effectively learn by sitting and copying notes in a lecture type setting.  Here we are living in a time where knowledge is everywhere, and one of the key skills we need to teach our students is how to access and use that knowledge which is all around us.

So how exactly is a learner like a box of chocolates? Well, based on Connectivism Theory, learning is no longer taking place exclusively within the human mind.  The Changing Nature of Knowledge says that The leaners themselves, the connections they form with each other, the connections they form with databases, with other sources of knowledge, is really the primary point of learning.  So in essence, the network becomes the learning.  So as teachers, or future teachers, it is very important for us to remember that each student we will have in our classroom will be a source of valuable knowledge to us and to their classmates.  It is impossible for one of us to know everything, and each student, like a box of chocolate, brings something new to the classroom.  This could be a perspective, a learning style, a different culture, a piece of knowledge, a new technology, really, the options are limitless.  It could even be a new way to connect and gain access to more knowledge.  Each of us is a database with information ready to be shared.  It is our responsibility as teachers to foster these connections and let students learn how to make their own connections, share knowledge, and explore for more.

To elaborate on Connectivism, let me begin by saying this theory was new to me.  If it's new to you too, the name more or less explains itself.  In very simplified terms, it's about how learning in the present age is more connected than it was in the past.  It's a theory which describes our current learning situation.  In Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age, Siemens says that Connectivism presents a model of learning that acknowledges the tectonic shifts in society where learning is no longer an internal, individualistic activity. That's right- learning is now very interconnected. Interconnected via books, via the internet and databases, and via all sorts of technologies which are readily and easily accessible.  And this interconnected learning shouldn't be taking place only on a world-wide scale, but also should be happening within the walls of your classroom.  Remember, your learners are like a box of chocolate- each with something unique to bring. 

My final thought is are our classrooms teaching students to live in a connective age? Not necessarily. Siemens states that The field of education has been slow to recognize both the impact of new learning tools and the environmental changes in what it means to learn.   I included the cartoon here because when I started looking up more information on the theory I found some negative feedback.  I think connectivism isn't not about teaching our students "how NOT to think," but rather, giving them the skills they need to access limitless information, think critically, and apply it.  It's not about teaching mindlessness, but rather mindfulness and the power that lies in having access to mountains of information we never had before, and how to evaluate it properly. If we as teachers embrace connectivism, it will allows us to teach the skills necessary for our students to not only learn the required material, but to succeed in a digital age.  With the skills and tools for how to search for answers and acquire new knowledge, our students will be equipped for whichever career path (or paths!) they head down in the future. To start embracing connectivism in your classroom, just remember our wise friend, Forrest.  A learner is like a box of chocolates.... You never know what you're gonna get.

3 comments:

  1. Really appropriate analogy. They are all very different people, bringing different perspectives, emotions, and ideas to the classroom. Food for thought (like my pun here?): if we are teaching students the "skills they need to access limitless information, think critically, and apply it...mindfulness and the power that lies in having access to mountains of information we never had before, and how to evaluate it properly" as well as teaching them the programs we need them to use, when do we have time to get to our LOTE/ESL/ELL/TOESL curriculum? That was a rhetorical question, of course. I am not being critical at all. Not one bit. I am just putting out there the idea that we have a monumental job in taking on this task and sometimes we have to wonder how we will fit it all in. A real question: in your opinion, should schools have a concerted effort across the curriculum to teach these skills, should they designate a certain class to teach them, or should they fall to the LMS?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Excellent thoughts, thank you! I agree. It comes down to the fact that teachers have a monumental job already, so when is there time to teach these new information skills AND teach an already full curriculum? To answer your question, I think we should look at teaching these skills as we should be teaching writing: writing and its skills should be taught in all classes (as there are discipline specific skills) and it is the same with internet inquiry and evaluation. Looking for authentic and quality sources to use in a Spanish classroom (like searching in the TL, for example), requires a completely different skill set than searching in Bio class. So I don't think that teaching these skills should fall solely on one teacher. I think it would be nice if a foundation could be taught in computer class, but teachers in their discipline could help further that discipline specific knowledge, too. Thank you for your "Food for thought!"

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree that it would be great to have a foundation in a computer class. One thing I am going to be touching on is the role of the LMS in computer literacy skills for kids and the excellent resource that they can be in a school setting. Thanks for your response and for such a great conversation!

    ReplyDelete